UK Energy analysis paper only tells one side of the story

| 09/04/2014 | 4 Comments

Today’s release by the UK government of its latest Scotland analysis paper ‘Energy’ is the newest in a series of depressingly one-sided and negative releases. Cobbled together in mind-numbing civil service prose, and constantly repeating itself,  it is hard to see who its target audience might be, except maybe those whose convictions are wavering as they watch the No vote decrease in the polls.

The paper can be easily enough summed up. It proclaims that energy costs will rise in an independent Scotland; there’s no guarantee of a market; we won’t be able to afford infrastructure investment; we can’t cope with oil price volatility; it’s all very difficult; taxpayers and consumers will suffer. An ‘analysis’ which goes out of its way to present only one side of the story in the worst possible light is not what most business people would understand by the word.

The paper almost entirely ignores the real difficulties faced by the UK’s need to ensure security of electricty supply and the uncertainties posed by Westminster politics.  A 2014 survey by utility investor specialists Exane found that “the UK tops the political risk table for the first time, and now ranks above Spain for political risk.” It also skates over the 2013 warning issued by regulator OfGem, which contained the following prediction:

Draft plan for Scotland's offshore wind energy

Draft plan for Scotland’s offshore wind energy

To illustrate the potential impact on customers, we estimate in the Reference Scenario that the probability of a large shortfall requiring the controlled disconnection of customers increases from around 1 in 47 years in winter 2013/14 to 1 in 12 years in 2015/16. This increases significantly to around 1 in 4 years if the demand reductions fail to materialise. Aside from the potential for controlled disconnections, any tightening in de-rated margins could impact customers through an increase in wholesale prices.

OfGem estimated the surplus of supply over demand could fall as low as 2%. In Scotland’s case, it is closer to 20%. Moreover, Scotland exports between 11% and 23% of its electricty to the rest of the UK. Yet the analysis paper suggests that there would be “no overriding need for the continuing UK to support Scottish energy costs to ensure its own security of supply.”  It is hard to see how OfGem and the UK government can both be right.

The fact is that the UK currently has an integrated energy market, with the National Grid ensuring balance of supply and demand. Using common sense, the Scottish government’s white paper suggests this continues, but with a separate Scottish regulator. The analysis paper’s negative spin on this is that it would involve long and tortuous negotiations, with added difficulties if the two countries’ energy policies differed.

Transmission-grid-in-the-nordic-countries_21
It’s nonsense. The Scandinavian and Baltic countries run a successful integrated electricty market without any apparent difficulty.  That’s a network involving seven independent countries, making up the biggest electricity market in Europe. The map on the left shows the extensive network connecting the countries. The enterprise and co-operation required to achieve this stands in sad contrast to the failure of imagination in the Energy analysis paper.

This is not even to mention the market for Scottish renewable energy. EU directives demand that the UK reaches 15% of energy equivalent generated from renewables by 2020. The figure for 2012 was 4.2% Even if by a miracle the rest of the UK reached its target without Scottish input,  it’s hard to see how there will fail to be a market for Scottish renewables ‘credits’ in other EU countries.

The doom-laden scenarios for an independent Scotland’s energy capacity outlined in this report are all too typical of the UK government’s analysis papers. But this one must have been more difficult to put together than most, since there’s little doubt that Scotland is an energy rich nation, and, with independence, will benefit from that huge advantage.

And it’s not just us saying that: Here’s Peter Strachan, professor of energy policy at Robert Gordon university, speaking on the radio today: “In no scenario can I see, in an independent Scotland, electricity bills increasing. Plus an independent Scotland, even with an integrated electricity market, would be able to sell its electricity at commercial rates. What would also be very helpful for Scotland’s renewable energy industry is that an independent Scotland would also be able to offer discretionary spend. So you could see a great big bunch, for example, of off-shore wind. At the moment what we are seeing, with the Coalition Government, is the off-shore renewable industry effectively being strangled at birth.”

See also: How an independent Scotland can become one of the richest energy nations in the world

  How Scotland is powering the renewables revolution

Join Business for Scotland – Sign our business declaration

Tags:

Category: Uncategorized

About the Author ()

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. James D says:

    It was announced today that all Scottish wind and wave energy off our coasts and in our hills is making contingency plans to relocate to England in the event of a “ yes” vote in the Scottish independence referendum.
    A spokesperson from the Better Together Bunch stated : “the future of these natural elements in an independent Scotland would be fraught with problems and could see the creation of an energy independent country, a substantial reduction in carbon emissions, the creation of far too many jobs and the lowering of consumer energy bills.”
    I thought I would pre-empt the Better Together Bunch and save them the trouble by alerting all you nasty cybernats about the environmental catastrophe that was looming on the independence horizon.
    They have warned us about everything else and they must be running out of inspiration so it was only a matter of time before they got round to warning us that large areas of our natural environment were about to head south, along with banks, businesses and anything else you could dream up if you were a slaverin’, incoherent, political mutation with a truly fine disregard for logic, commonsense or fact.
    I apologise to readers of this fine blog ,but I am having a bad day: I just got a “United with Labour” leaflet through my letter box called “Keep The UK Keep The Pound” and the content surpasses, by a long way, the amount of 100% proof pish contained within my wee rant.

  2. Stevie says:

    Nice one – good article, useful

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *